The Society’s objections can be viewed here.
All posts by Bob
Whitehouse Farm development application – Society’s initial objections
Applications: CC/14/04301/OUT also see here
Proposals: Outline planning application with all matters reserved (except for access) for the first phase of development for up to 750 homes with access from Old Broyle Road, temporary access from Clay Lane, a local centre (with associated employment, retail and community uses), primary school, informal and formal open space (including a Country Park), playing pitches, associated landscaping, utilities and drainage infrastructure with on site foul sewage package treatment plant or pumping station with connection to Tangmere Waste Water Treatment Works.
Society response: A very short period of time was given for a response to be made to the Planning Application CC/14/04301/OUT. In our initial response (click here) Chairman Richard Childs objects to the failure adequately to consult and considers that this Masterplan must be revised to create a southern access route from the start of Phase 1 so that construction traffic can be directed from Cathedral Way roundabout direct to the new development. A more formal response is being prepared.
Meanwhile – The Council invite observations on the above application by 7 June 2016. To view the application click on the application number above.
Our Response to the Review of the Character Appraisal and Management Proposals
Chichester Conservation Area Character Appraisal, published in March 2005 has been reviewed and updated by the Council as part of a program to update all the districts conservation area appraisals. The review (available here) of the conservation area included an examination of the existing boundaries of the conservation area to consider the potential for other areas to be included and, if appropriate, where existing areas should be excluded.
A public consultation ended 3 June 2016 on the revised character appraisal document, proposed changes to the conservation area boundary, and proposals for additional planning controls, through the use of Article 4 Direction, to protect the area’s character .
The Chichester Society submitted its response which can be viewed here.
Pallants Residents Association established
Residents Associations provide a vital role in protecting and enhancing the communities which they represent. The Pallant area in Chichester is suffering from the increase in heavy traffic within the City and this article by resident and Society member Cedric Mitchell describes the birth of this new association.
(The article – along with others – appeared in the June 2016 issue of the Chichester Society Newsletter )

First a bit of background. Why are the Pallants important? They are at the historic and cultural centre of Chichester. The origins of the Pallants dates back to at least the middle ages when the South East sector of the city belonged to the Church. Originally named the Palatine (from the word palatial) the name became corrupted to the Pallants and consisted of the four streets we have now.
Paving the Way to Today
In 1578 the streets of Chichester were paved under an Act of Parliament. In the eighteenth century Chichester went through something of a renaissance and many houses in the Pallants were gentrified. Among the houses built at this time was Dodo House which was built for Henry Peckam, a wine merchant, in 1712. This is of course now the Pallant Gallery. Since then it has continued to be an area for wealthy merchants and professional people. Today probably a majority of the buildings in the Pallants are listed grade II and all four Pallants have historic paving. The Pallants are also a conservation area.
Problems with Trade Deliveries
Although not a shopping street, the Pallants are one of the things that people come to Chichester to see and the area is very much on the City guide route. In the 1970’s East Street and North Street were pedestrianised and much thought was given to servicing the shops in these streets. East Street was to be served from a back area leading off Cooper Street and a similar arrangement was put in place for North Street. Additionally deliveries to premises in these streets could easily be made out of shopping hours.
In general this has worked well, but in recent years two things have happened. Overtime working gave rise to deliveries out of hours and 40ft articulated lorries were not envisaged when the pedestrian area was born. As a result of this we now have a situation where these large lorries attempt to use the Pallants to service shops in East Street. A second problem is that ‘sat navs’ misdirect drivers thinking that there is a through route. This has resulted in 40ft articulated lorries having to make a three point turn or else reverse the length of North and South Pallant.
Not only is this upsetting for the residents (in some of the smaller properties there are bedroom windows on a level with the driver’s cab) but it results in considerable damage to the listed buildings in the street as well as causing damage to the historic paving, to say nothing of the inevitable damage to parked cars.
I brought the continuing damage caused to buildings and pavements to the attention of the Chichester Conservation Area Advisory Committee (CCAAC). Alan Green, Chairman of the CCAAC wrote several strong letters to the leader of West Sussex Council. This produced words of sympathy but no action or solutions. As a result it was suggested that the residents might see better results if complaints came from an official body.
Formation of the Residents Association
So in January 2016 an inaugural meeting of the proposed Pallants Residents Association was held at which Tony Earl agreed to Chair the Association. The other Officers (as of June 2016) are Catherine Gunn Treasurer, Rowena Daniels Secretary and myself as Vice Chairman. A further meeting held on 7 March was attended by over 40 residents at which the Officers were confirmed. Alan Green was invited to give a talk on the history of the Pallants.
Since the Residents Association was formed several successes have been achieved. Notably a meeting was held with the Transport manager of Iceland Foods (who were one of the worst offenders) which resulted in strict instructions being given to their drivers not to enter South Pallant. Better signage from the South Pallant car park has also been achieved.
Less successful have been negotiations with West Sussex County Council to adopt preventative measures to protect buildings and pavements. The fight goes on.
The setting up of the residents association has also had wider benefits to the streets. It has instilled a much greater sense of community and further social activities are planned for the future.
Cedric Mitchell, June 2016
Objections to the proposed Waste Water Treatment Works at Whitehouse Farm
Albion Water are planning a waste water treatment plant for developers Linden Homes and Miller Homes at Whitehouse Farm, Chichester, West Sussex. The Environmental Agency has consulted on the environmental permit application ref EPR/SB3338AD/A001 and the Chichester Society has, through its Chairman, raised several objections as detailed in a letter than can be consulted here.
Crossword – March 2016 Newsletter
An underlying theme of this crossword is the environment, so several of the answers relate to this topic.
CLUES
Across
7 Divest of trees (13)
8 Immediately after this (8)
9 Nope it’s not closed (4)
10 This open framework may be tactile (7)
12 Open these gates and you may get wet (5)
14 They make a beeline for these (5)
16 Belonging to the same group (7)
19 Not a monetary pound (4)
20 A farm dawn may address climate change (4,4)
22 Capable of decaying (13)
Down
1 Past subjective of be (4)
2 Set for is collection of trees (6)
3 Positive feeling of admiration (7)
4 Not sit (5)
5 Trolls walk this way (6)
6 Immediately after this (8)
11 Arian CID leads to dangerous precipitation (4,4)
13 A seat of seeds (7)
15 Include or contain (6)
17 Group fighting in public (6)
18 Tool for bending cold metal (5)
21 A principle of behaviour (4)
For solution click here
If you wish to read the articles that appeared in this issue click here
ChiSoc submits CFT renewal to Civic Voice Design Awards
ChiSoc has submitted the Chichester Festival Theatre renovation scheme to the Civic Voice 2016 design awards competition.
To be successful, projects have to make a significant contribution to the quality of life in our villages, towns and cities and the Society believes that the outcome of the Theatre’s RENEW project would fully justify the award.
IN THE EVENT THE SUBMISSION WAS UNSUCCESSFUL
A27 Proposals – position statement from the Society
The Chairman of the Society, Richard Childs, Society issued a press release on 19 January which reads as follows.
‘The Chichester Society has looked at the maps recently published by the Observer showing possible upgrades for the A27. Richard Childs, the Chairman, said “The Chichester Society has a responsibility to support whatever is best for Chichester as a whole”.
We currently have a situation in which everyone agrees that something must be done. Predictably, North Chichester and Lavant have come out in favour of a southern route, and South Chichester and Selsey in favour of a northern route.
As ever the devil is in the detail. Will a northern route contain sufficient environmental safeguards to prevent the destruction of the scenic value of the South Downs? Will a southern route have the capacity to cope with the vast expansion of Chichester proposed in the Local Plan? Should temporary traffic congestion determine the choice of a route which will be in place for decades to come? While the leaked maps are useful in helping to frame such questions, lines on a map do not provide answers. For this reason the Society will hold a watching brief and comment or campaign as appropriate once the full consultation is launched.’
The original document can be viewed by clicking here.
The Field (often referred to as Henty Field)
A map of the field referred to in the article by Tim Rooth in the December 2015 issue of the Newsletter can be viewed by clicking here
The name to which the field will be referred in the future is currently being considered by the Friends of the Field Group who can be contacted via Tim Rooth email tim_rooth@yahoo.co.uk.
Crossword – December 2015 Newsletter
An underlying theme of this crossword is architecture, so several of the answers relate to this art.
CLUES
Across
1 Tears may result if you are hit by this (5)
4 Plant a collection of sports cars (7)
8 I’m no great-aunt creates a row (13)
9 Elsy sleeps, why not? (9)
11 Cunning is costly (3)
12 My measure is part tricky (6)
13 Flying buttress style (6)
16 A familiar father (3)
17 Home admin is argumentative (2,7)
18 15th and 16th century line (13)
20 He thirsts for these garments (1-6)
21 A rustic dialect (5)
Down
1 No trams need a cross-beam (7)
2 An opening for edge merchants (9,4)
3 A forceful memory (3)
4 This support may be part intelligent (6)
5 Mrs Rafton may change shape (9)
6 A retailer all at sea perhaps (5,8)
7 A familiar address for a junior (5)
10 A war-like representative no longer tense (9)
14 Descriptive of cloth is MacCrib (7)
15 Diffuse or direct light, he’s sad to do it (6)
16 He opted out of this establishment (5)
19 A fishy treaty without a car (3)
For solution click here
If you wish to read the articles that appeared in this issue click here


